Which section of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 addresses the presumption of proof against the accused?

Anti Terrorism Act 1997 MCQs for PPSC, FPSC, NTS, and Pakistan government job tests. Select an option below, then read the explanation.

Browse all Anti Terrorism Act 1997 MCQs →

PPSCFPSCNTSPakistan govt jobs

Subject: Anti Terrorism Act 1997judiciary-and-law-mcqs › anti-terrorism-act-1997
Published: 3 May 2019
Last updated: 28 May 2026

Browse all Anti Terrorism Act 1997 MCQs →

Explanation

Section 27 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 specifically deals with the presumption of proof against the accused, making it a key provision in such cases.

Practice related questions from the same subject.

1.In which schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 are the scheduled offences listed?
2.What is covered under the First Schedule of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997?
3.Which section of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 addresses the issue of contempt of court?
4.Who is authorized under Section 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 to make changes to the Schedule?
5.According to Section 31 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, a judgment, order, or sentence delivered by an Anti-Terrorism Court shall be considered ____________, pending the outcome of any appeal under this Act.
6.Which authority has the power to impose penalties for flawed investigations?
7.According to Section 25(10), what is the maximum number of consecutive adjournments that a Bench can allow while hearing an appeal?
8.According to section 25(3), what is the time frame within which a person convicted by the Anti-Terrorism Court must file an appeal to the High Court?

← Back to Judiciary And Law Mcqs

Which section of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 addresses the presumption of proof against the accused?

Explanation

More Anti Terrorism Act 1997 MCQs