Critics claim that this method can be overly "judgmental." Some argue that literature ought to be evaluated mainly (or exclusively) based on its artistic qualities. Which approach is criticized for this drawback?

Explanation

Option A refers to analyzing literature through psychological perspectives. Option B focuses on the text's form and structure. Option C involves assessing literature based on ethical or philosophical standards, which is often seen as overly judgmental. Option D considers the author's life and historical background. Therefore, the moral/philosophical approach is the one criticized for being too judgmental.